America's Death Penalty: Between Past and Present by David Garland

By David Garland

During the last 3 a long time, the USA has embraced the loss of life penalty with tenacious enthusiasm. whereas such a lot of these international locations whose felony platforms and cultures are more often than not in comparison to the us have abolished capital punishment, the USA keeps to hire this final software of punishment. The loss of life penalty has completed an unprecedented prominence in our public lifestyles and left an indelible imprint on our politics and tradition. It has additionally provoked excessive scholarly debate, a lot of it dedicated to explaining the roots of yankee exceptionalism.America’s demise Penalty takes a unique method of the problem by way of reading the old and theoretical assumptions that experience underpinned the dialogue of capital punishment within the usa this present day. At a variety of instances the dying penalty has been portrayed as an anachronism, an inheritance, or an innovation, with little mirrored image at the outcomes that stream from the alternative of phrases. This quantity represents an attempt to revive the feel of capital punishment as a query stuck up in background. Edited through major students of crime and justice, those unique essays pursue diverse ideas for unsettling the standard phrases of the talk. specifically, the authors use comparative and old investigations of either Europe and the USA so as to solid clean gentle on commonplace questions on the that means of capital punishment. This quantity is vital studying for knowing the loss of life penalty in America.Contributors: David Garland, Douglas Hay, Randall McGowen, Michael Meranze, Rebecca McLennan, and Jonathan Simon.

Show description

Read or Download America's Death Penalty: Between Past and Present PDF

Best rules & procedures books

Privilege or Punish: Criminal Justice and the Challenge of Family Ties

This e-book solutions uncomplicated yet under-appreciated questions: first, how does the yank legal justice approach handle a defendant's relatives prestige? And, moment, how may still a defendant's relatives prestige be well-known, if in any respect, in a felony justice procedure positioned inside of a liberal democracy devoted to egalitarian ideas of non-discrimination?

Red scare in court: New York versus the International Workers Order

A meticulously specific old account of 1 of the casualties of the chilly battle politics of the Fifties. Arthur J. Sabin has had exceptional entry to the records of either side, hence supplying an extraordinary "behind the scenes" portrait of the case.

A Guide to the ICDR International Arbitration Rules

This remark at the foreign Centre for Dispute solution (ICDR) principles is a entire reference paintings for practitioners and arbitrators contemplating ICDR arbitration. The overseas Centre for Dispute solution (ICDR) is the overseas department of the yank Arbitration organization (AAA) and on condition that an far more than six hundred arbitrations are actually administered each year lower than the ICDR principles, this e-book solutions the necessity for the 1st comparative consultant dedicated to them.

Judging the Jury

During this paintings, Hans and Vidmar evaluate the old evolution of the trial jury, the modern position of the jury within the American felony justice process, and destiny clients for the jury as an institutional strength.

Extra info for America's Death Penalty: Between Past and Present

Sample text

The historical investigations offered here disrupt both assumptions, creating the possibility for finding new ways of talking about capital punishment. Of the essays that follow, three consider the longer-term history of capital punishment, those by David Garland, Michael Meranze, and Randall McGowen. These essays share a great deal, but they also pursue different trajectories at crucial moments. They stage a debate with the goal of making more explicit the importance of theory to the arguments over capital punishment, and to offer examples of particular interpretations that might Introduction | 21 contribute to our understanding of the issue.

Human Rights Policy,” in Ignatieff, American Exceptionalism, 175–76, and, more generally, 147–97. 4. J. , Lawmakers Vote Not to Reinstate Capital Punishment,” Washington Post, April 13, 2005. 5. Scott Turow, Ultimate Punishment (New York, 2003). 6. S. but Now Has Doubts over Death Row,” Guardian, November 15, 2009; “Death Sentences Decline,” Yahoo! News, December 18, 2009. 7. “Controversy Builds in Texas over an Execution,” New York Times, October 20, 2009; “Cameron Todd Willingham: Former Head of Texas Forensics Panel Probing 1991 Fire Says He Felt Pressured by Gov.

Judges (the usual sentencing authority) and governors (with the power of clemency) have exercised a major influence over who dies and why. In the process, capital justice has assumed a major role in constituting and sustaining particular conceptions of authority. 43 The essays by Hay and Simon take up aspects of this relationship between executive and legal officials and the operation of the death penalty. Hay charts the changing positions of English judges in relation to capital justice over the past three hundred years.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.06 of 5 – based on 48 votes